Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 699 P2D 343 - Adams v. Pipeliners Union 798

Adams v. Pipeliners Union 798’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 2009
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody · Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin · Regents of the University of California v. Bakke · Hansberry v. Lee · Boeing Co. v. Van Gemert

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “imposed a quota requiring the Union in filling any job order in Alaska to allocate 2.2% of its dispatches to blacks.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he threshold issue to Adams's appeal is whether he has standing to bring it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “sufficient personal stake in the controversy to guarantee ... adversity....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.