Cypress v. Com.’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
April 2022
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Crawford v. Washington · Fahy v. Connecticut · Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts · Maryland v. Craig
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"[w]hether such an error is harmless in a particular case depends upon a host of factors, all readily accessible to reviewing courts. These factors include the importance of the [tainted evidence] in the prosecution's case, whether [that evidence] was cumulative, the presence or absence of evidence corroborating or contradicting the [tainted evidence] on material points . . . and, of course, the overall strength of the prosecution's case."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Crawford v. Com.“the procedure established in former Code § 19.2-187.1 did not adequately safeguard a criminal defendant's rights under the Confrontation Clause”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Brooks v. Com.“`be confronted with' the analysts at trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Aguilar v. Com.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.