Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 699 S.E.2d 206 - Cypress v. Com.

Cypress v. Com.’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
April 2022
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Crawford v. Washington · Fahy v. Connecticut · Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts · Maryland v. Craig

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"[w]hether such an error is harmless in a particular case depends upon a host of factors, all readily accessible to reviewing courts. These factors include the importance of the [tainted evidence] in the prosecution's case, whether [that evidence] was cumulative, the presence or absence of evidence corroborating or contradicting the [tainted evidence] on material points . . . and, of course, the overall strength of the prosecution's case."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the procedure established in former Code § 19.2-187.1 did not adequately safeguard a criminal defendant's rights under the Confrontation Clause”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “`be confronted with' the analysts at trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.