McElhaney v. Uebrich’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Lassitter v. Intern. Union of Op. Engin. · 481 So. 2d 1241 - Phillips v. Ostrer · 661 So. 2d 1301 - WR Grace & Company-Conn. v. Pyke · 609 So. 2d 637 - Burgess v. Mid-Florida Service · 511 So. 2d 679 - Balsera v. ABDM & P. CORP.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]f there are no math experts on the jury, it is quite probable that the verdict form will contain some type of calculation error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.