699 So. 2d 1312 - Franqui v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 81 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 87 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably 739 So. 2d 568 - Ramirez v. State (1999), 808 So. 2d 145 - Darling v. State (2002)
2 federal appellate · 81 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ohio v. Roberts · Idaho v. Wright · Soberon v. United States · Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona · United States Accardi v. Shaughnessy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 87 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) that a crime of the type charged was committed; and (2) that the crime was committed through the criminal agency of another.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Anton · N.G.S. v. State“[t]he scope of voir dire questioning rests in the sound discretion of the court and will not be interfered with unless that discretion is clearly abused.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“In order to prove attempted armed robbery, the State must show: (1) the formation of an intent to commit the crime of robbery; (2) the commission of some physical act in furtherance of the robbery; and (3) the use of a firearm. See §§ 777.04(1), 812.13(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (1993); Cooper v. Wainwright, 308 So.2d 182, 184 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. dismissed, 312 So.2d 761 (Fla.1975). In this context, intent may be proved by considering the conduct of the accused and his colleagues before, during, and after the alleged attempt along with any other relevant circumstances. Cooper, 308 So.2d at 185 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.