Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 699 SO2D 289 - Plaza v. State

Plaza v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
February 2008
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · 457 So. 2d 481 - State v. Neil · Taylor v. United States · Melbourne v. State · Williams v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The practical use of [the Neil/Melbourne objection], however, is rapidly degenerating into a strategic way for attorneys to pollute the trial record with baseless objections, alleging racial, ethnic and gender discrimination, which are completely unsubstantiated by the record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.