Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 699 SO2D 314 - Austin v. State

Austin v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
January 2012
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently January 2012

16 state decisions

100199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Benton v. Maryland · 634 So. 2d 618 - Florida Dept. of Revenue v. Herre · 634 So. 2d 607 - Novaton v. State · 483 So. 2d 420 - State v. Johnson · 652 So. 2d 815 - Salgat v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “appl[icability of] the fundamental error rule announced in Johnson to both a defendant's convictions and sentences”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.