In re White’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
January 2003
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. Formal private reprimand, 1985, improper handling of client settlement funds; 2. Formal private reprimand, 1985, improper handling of client settlement funds; 3. Ninety (90) day suspension, 1989, improper handling of client funds; 4. Admonition, 1994, failure to cooperate and respond to written complaint; 5. Admonition, 1995, incompetence, lack of diligence, and failure to communicate with a client.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re White
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.