Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 699 So. 2d 461 - State v. Lee

699 So. 2d 461 - State v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2003
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Dorthey · 573 So. 2d 528 - State v. Benjamin · State v. Young · 669 So. 2d 1223 - State v. Yearby · State ex rel. Tucker v. Ward

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Status as HIV positive is not a legislatively recognized mitigating factor for sentencing or for deviation from the mandatory minimum sentence prescribed under the Habitual Offender Law. Although we sympathize with the defendant, the state, through the Department of Corrections, has established medical policies and procedures to manage and support these prisoners. Because HIV and AIDS are prevalent in prisons today, reasonable and compassionate policies for the management of prisoners as they progress through the stages of the disease exist.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “because of the defendant's long and serious criminal and anti-social history.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.