Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 699 So. 2d 567 - Snapp v. Harrison

699 So. 2d 567 - Snapp v. Harrison’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently June 2016 · most notably 47 So. 3d 148 - Buckel v. Chaney (2010), 887 So. 2d 777 - Gallagher Bassett Services v. Jeffcoat (2004)

25 state decisions

120199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 467 So. 2d 657 - Bell v. City of Bay St. Louis · 508 So. 2d 1111 - Foster v. State · Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Woodham · 641 So. 2d 20 - Tharp v. Bunge Corp. · 615 So. 2d 580 - Burton by Bradford v. Barnett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “given the evidence as a whole, taken in the light most favorable to the verdict, no reasonable, hypothetical juror could have found as the jury found.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Our standard for review is de novo in passing on questions of law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The principle that violation of a statute constitutes negligence per se is so elementary that it does not require citation of authority. When a statute is violated, the injured party is entitled to an instruction that the party violating is guilty of negligence, and if that negligence proximately caused or contributed to the injury, then the injured party is entitled to recover.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.