Young v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 557 So. 2d 899 - Caracciolo v. State · 674 So. 2d 123 - Justice v. State · 497 So. 2d 2 - State v. Bloom · 661 So. 2d 282 - State v. Blackwell · 667 So. 2d 772 - Rodriguez v. Cohen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Our decision today will apply only to those cases where the issue was properly preserved in the trial court and is still being contested at the trial or appellate level. It will not apply to cases that have become final or provide a basis for relief in post-conviction collateral proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Carter v. State“To permit a court to initiate proceedings for enhanced punishment against a defendant would blur the lines between the prosecution and the independent role of the court as a fair and unbiased adjudicator and referee of the disputes between the parties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the decision to prosecute a defendant as an habitual offender is a prosecutorial function to be initiated at the prosecutor's discretion and not by the court”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Cotton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.