Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

699 So. 2d 849

Docket No. 96-3485.

Calloway v. State

Samuel CALLOWAY, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 1, 1997.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1997-10-01

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“petition for habeas corpus cannot be used to circumvent the two-year period for filing motions for postconviction relief.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Frazier v. State

Relies on 604 So. 2d 465 - Scott v. Dugger · 674 So. 2d 889 - Leichtman v. Singletary · 523 So. 2d 639 - State v. Broom

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-10-01

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently November 2018

16 state decisions

110199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Samuel Calloway, in proper person.

¶2Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Mark Rosenblatt, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

¶3Before JORGENSON, GERSTEN and GREEN, JJ.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Defendant appeals from the denial of his Petition for Habeas Corpus. We dismiss this appeal. Defendant candidly admits in his motion that he was convicted in the seventeenth judicial circuit in 1993, and that he can no longer file a timely motion pursuant to Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850 in that circuit. Defendant further admits that he filed his Petition for Habeas Corpus in Dade County in an attempt to avoid the limitations period imposed by rule 3.850. A petition for habeas corpus cannot be used to circumvent the two-year period for filing motions for postconviction relief. Scott v. Dugger, 604 So.2d 465, 470 (Fla.1992); Leichtman v. Singletary, 674 So.2d 889, 891-92 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

¶6A more significant reason for our dismissal of this appeal, however, is that the trial court in Dade County was without jurisdiction *850 to entertain defendant's petition. "[A] circuit court has no jurisdiction to review the legality of a conviction in another circuit...." State v. Broom, 523 So.2d 639, 641 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

¶7Appeal dismissed.

/699/so2d/849 · .json · Public domain