Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 699 SO2D 984 - Escobar v. State

Escobar v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
August 2006
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Frazier v. Cupp · 596 So. 2d 957 - Traylor v. State · 471 So. 2d 32 - Tillman v. State · 680 So. 2d 413 - Bonifay v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A trial court's ruling on a motion to suppress comes to this Court clothed with a presumption of correctness and, as the reviewing court, we must interpret the evidence and reasonable inferences and deductions derived therefrom in a manner most favorable to sustaining the trial court's ruling.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The State must show by a preponderance of the evidence that the confession was freely and voluntarily given and that the rights of the accused were knowingly and intelligently waived.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “police misrepresentation alone does not necessarily render a confession involuntary”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.