Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 699 SW2D 531 - State v. Nobles

State v. Nobles’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 2018

5 state decisions

201985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Wiley · State v. Barber · State v. Burns · State v. Polk · State v. West

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Exclusive control of the premises on which controlled substances are found raises an inference of possession and control of those substances. But if there is joint control of the premises, some further evidence is necessary to connect the accused with the drugs.” (Citation omitted.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “where use and control of the premises is not exclusive, this predicate is diluted and the inference is no longer compelling in the absence of some further evidence or admission connecting the defendant with the illegal drugs.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.