Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 699 S.W.2d 814 - State v. Kirk

State v. Kirk’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
3
states following
April 2001
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Johnson v. Zerbst · Bullock v. United States · Taylor v. United States · Phelps Dodge Corp. v. AFL-CIO Joint Negotiating Committee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An accused who has notice of the time and place of the trial and of his right to attend, and who nonetheless voluntarily absents himself, will be deemed to have waived his right to be present.... [T]he court should indulge every reasonable presumption against a waiver. Counsel should be given a reasonable opportunity to locate his client, and there should be affirmative evidence that the accused was informed of his trial date. We think it is wise to take special precautions when a defendant fails to appear on the date set for trial and to require a high standard of proof that the defendant knew his trial date and that his absence is voluntary. Trial in his absence is not favored.... Mere absence at the time the case is called for trial is insufficient to show a waiver of the right to be present.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “that Rule 43 does not bar a trial when a defendant fails to appear on his trial date. An accused who has notice of the time and place of the trial and of his right to attend, and who nonetheless voluntarily absents himself, will be deemed to have waived his right to be present.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.