7 Ariz. App. 200 - State v. Hernandez’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
34 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently November 2005 · most notably State v. Lee (1997), State v. Canedo (1980)
34 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 28 Cal. 2d 306 - People v. Peete · Shotwell Manufacturing Co. v. United States · State v. Little · Sullivan v. State of Arizona · State v. Evans
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * there are occasions when conduct of the defendant at other times than during the commission of the crime with which he is charged has direct probative value, and, when such is the case, the admission of such evidence is proper even though such conduct might be criminal in nature.” 109 Ariz. at 389 , 509 P.2d at 1036 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Byrd · State v. Allen““ . . . it is required that there be a high degree of similarity between the offenses and an element of uniqueness in the method of commiting the crimes so as to give grounds for the inference that the crimes are committed by the same person.” 7 Ariz.App. at 204 , 437 P.2d at 956 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““Our Supreme Court has on three occasions held that the failure to give this particular limiting instruction is not fun damental error. (citations omitted). Other jurisdictions hold that failure to request this instruction constitutes a waiver. Baker v. United States, 310 F.2d 924 (9th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 372 U.S. 954 , 83 S.Ct. 952 , 9 L.Ed.2d 978 (1963). (further citations omitted).””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Taylor
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.