7 Ariz. App. 354 - Christy v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently June 2016
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n v. Compton · Pratt v. Daly · Alires v. Southern Pacific Company · Lutfy v. Lockhart · Caldwell v. Tremper
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““No person shall rent a motor vehicle to another until he has inspected the operator’s or chauffeur’s license of the person to whom the vehicle is to be rented and compared and verified the signature thereon with the signature of the person written in his presence.” (A.R.S. § 28-477)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[w]e are not prepared to legislate strict tort liability by judicial decision....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““Our Supreme Court has held that in order to recover, the plaintiff must show that violation of a statute or ordinance was the proximate cause of his injury. In Pratt v. Daly, 55 Ariz. 535 , 104 P.2d 147 , 130 A.L.R. 341 (1940), the court said: ‘ * * * Whenever a valid statute or regulation provides that a certain thing must or must not be done, if a failure to comply with such regulation is a proximate cause of injury to another, such failure is actionable negligence per se. * * * ’ (Additional emphasis ours) 55 Ariz. at 537 , 104 P.2d at 148 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.