Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 7 Ariz. App. 365 - Kelch v. Courson

7 Ariz. App. 365 - Kelch v. Courson’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
September 1988
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently September 1988

2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

40196819701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Layton v. Rocha · Trojanovich v. Marshall · Boies v. Cole · Casey v. Marshall · Beliak Ex Rel. Beliak v. Plants

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““No objection was made by plaintiffs’ counsel when this statement was made nor was there any motion for a mistrial prior to the submission of the case to the jury. After a jury verdict in favor of the defendants, the plaintiffs raised the impropriety of this statement for the first time * * *. “In this state, our courts are given considerable discretion in passing upon matters which may call for mistrial or new trial, Mahoney v. Frost, 101 Ariz. 344 , 419 P.2d 523 (1966), and, with a few exceptions, misconduct in closing argument must be objected to at the time of the alleged misconduct. Beliak v. Plants, 93 Ariz. 266 , 379 P.2d 976 (1963).” 7 Ariz.App. at 369, 370, 439 P.2d at 532, 533 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““We believe the ‘look is to see’ doctrine is one permitting an inference, not one mandating it. We hold that the instruction was properly refused.” 7 Ariz.App. at 369 , 439 P.2d at 532 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.