Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 7 ARKAPP 205 - Turner v. Pennington

Turner v. Pennington’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
April 2012
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently April 2012

13 state decisions

701983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bicknell v. Barnes · Dicus v. Allen · Mack Financial Corp. v. Carter Oil Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “warrants a finding that a mutual mistake occurred. Bicknell, supra ; Turner v. Pennington, 7 Ark.App. 205 , 646 S.W.2d 28 (1983). However, the proof need not be undisputed in order to obtain reformation. Winkle v. Grand Nat'l Bank, 267 Ark. 123 , 601 S.W.2d 559 (1980). Bicknell, supra ; Turner, supra . Although we continue to hear chancery cases de novo,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.