Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

7 Blackf. 240

Tate v. Wymond

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1844

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1844-11-25

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1844-11-25

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 1914

8 state decisions

3018441850186018701880189019001910decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1A SPECIALTY creditor madé a parol agreement with his principal debtor on the day the debt became due, without the surety’s consent, to give him (the principal debtor) the further time of one year for payment; and the time was given accordingly. Held, in an action of debt against the surety, that these facts were no defence to the suit. Davey v. Prendergrass, 5 B. & Ald. 187.

¶2*241In debt on a specialty, the plea of nil debet, though bad on general demurrer, is not a nüllity ; and a finaFjudgment for the plaintiff in such suit, there being a plea of nil debet unanswered, is erroneous.

/7/blackf/240 · .json · Public domain