Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

7 Blackf. 70

State v. Cromwell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1844

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1844-01-30

<p>The declaration, in a suit by the state on a sheriff’s bond, need not aver that the bond had been approved and recorded.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1882

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1844-01-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Dewet, J.

¶1— Debt against a sheriff and his sureties on his official bond, conditioned for the faithful discharge of his duties. Breach, that the sheriff voluntarily permitted a prisoner, who had been convicted of a crime and fined, to escape. Special demurrer to the declaration, assigning for cause, that it did not appear that the bond had been “ approved and recorded as required by law.” The Court sustained the demurrer and rendered judgment for the defendants.

¶2This decision was wrong. There was no need of averring that the bond had been approved or recorded. Neither was essential to its validity.

Per Curiam.

¶3— The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.

/7/blackf/70 · .json · Public domain