Martin v. Travers

Decided July 1, 1857

California Supreme Court · decided 1857-07-01

Minor S. Martin, the proprietor of a store on the corner of Clay and Kearny streets, in San Francisco, procured an injunction from the Court below against the defendants, proprietors and drivers of cabs, restraining them from using the street in front of his store as a stand for their hacks and cabs. The defendants made a motion to dissolve the injunction, which being denied, they appealed from the order of the Court refusing to dissolve the injunction.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1857-07-01

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently November 1986

4 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Burnett, J.,

¶1delivered the opinion of the Court—Murray, C. J., concurring.

¶2This is an appeal from an order of the Superior Court of San Francisco refusing to dissolve an injunction. The three hundred and forty-seventh section of the Practice Act specifies the cases in which appeals are allowed from the orders and judgments of the District Courts and the Superior Court of San Francisco. No appeal is allowed from an order refusing to dissolve an injunction, nor from an order changing the place of trial. The appeal should be taken from the order granting the injunction.

¶3Appeal dismissed.