7 Cal. 2d 48 - Bruton v. Tearle’s Empirical Analysis
1936
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 48 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently November 1981 · most notably Weinberg v. Weinberg (1967), 17 Cal. 2d 108 - Biewend v. Biewend (1941)
5 federal appellate · 48 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Audubon v. Shufeldt · Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Bentley · Fanchier v. Gammill · 126 Cal. App. 280 - Creager v. Superior Court · Pacific Bank v. Robinson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ . . Appellant’s claim of exemption was made an issue before the trial court and appellant had a full opportunity to be heard thereon. There was ample evidence that the earnings affected by the order . . . were not necessary for the support of appellant’s family and the trial court properly concluded that said earnings were not exempt. ’ ’ ’”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Conaway v. Conaway
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.