7 Cal. 4th 634 - Moore v. Conliffe’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 150 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 196 later decisions — most recently November 2020 · most notably 31 Cal. 4th 709 - Hassan v. Mercy American River Hospital (2003), 142 Cal. App. 4th 1457 - McKell v. Washington Mut., Inc. (2006)
18 federal appellate · 150 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Briscoe v. W · 5 Cal. 3d 584 - Serrano v. Priest · 50 Cal. 3d 205 - Silberg v. Anderson · 3 Cal. 4th 1 - Moncharsh v. Heily & Blase · 46 Cal. 2d 375 - Albertson v. Raboff
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 196 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“applies to any communication (1) made in judicial or quasi-judicial proceedings; (2) by litigants or other participants authorized by law; (3) to achieve the objects of the litigation; and (4) that have some connection or logical relation to the action.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“the aggrieved party [has been] deliberately kept in ignorance of the action or proceeding, or in some other way fraudulently prevented from presenting his claim or defense.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“narrow doctrine permitting a collateral attack on a judgment,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.