Callnon v. Callnon’s Empirical Analysis
1935
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently July 2015 · most notably Huber v. Huber (1946), Williams v. Williams (1950)
2 federal appellate · 42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brown v. Brown · Taylor v. Taylor · Baar v. Smith · Dunn v. Mullan · De Godey v. Godey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In an action for divorce the parties may seek a determination of their property rights; but, if they elect not to do so, such rights are not deemed adjudicated and are subject to determination in another proceeding. (Brown v. Brown, supra [ 170 Cal. 1 ( 147 P. 1168 )]; De Godey v. Godey, 39 Cal. 157, 163 ; Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Welch, 202 Cal. 312, 315 [ 260 P. 545 ]; Tarien v. Katz, 216 Cal. 554, 558 [ 15 P.2d 493 , 85 A.L.R. 334 ]; Taylor v. Taylor, 192 Cal. 71, 75 [ 218 P. 756 , 51 A.L.R. 1074 ].)””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.