People v. Cady’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 46 Cal. 2d 818 - People v. Watson · 53 Cal. 3d 771 - People v. Cooper · 30 Cal. 3d 290 - People v. Watson · 34 Cal. 4th 1 - People v. Coffman · 38 Cal. 4th 1224 - People v. Reed
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'In deciding whether multiple conviction is proper, a court should consider only the statutory elements.' [Citation.] 'Under the elements test, if the statutory elements of the greater offense include all of the statutory elements of the lesser offense, the latter is necessarily included in the former.' [Citation.] In other words, ' "[i]f a crime cannot be committed without also necessarily committing a lesser offense, the latter is a lesser included offense within the former.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Shiga · People v. Aguayo“[i]f a crime cannot be committed without also necessarily committing a lesser offense, the latter is a lesser included offense within the former.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Shiga · People v. Aguayo“In general, a person may be convicted of, although not punished for, more than one crime arising out of the same act or course of conduct.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Shiga · People v. Aguayo
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.