People v. Goodrich’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 233 Cal. App. 4th 1085 - People v. Rivera · 50 Cal. 4th 1055 - Lopez v. Superior Court · 57 Cal. 4th 1211 - People v. Harrison · 237 Cal. App. 4th 303 - People v. Shabazz · People v. Scarbrough
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'substantial danger of physical harm to others,' " the Goodrich court opined that applying Proposition 47 "retroactively for the collateral purpose of invalidating an initial MDO commitment long after it was properly imposed would be at odds with the purpose intended by the voters.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“is not predicated upon [an individual's] felony conviction; rather, it is predicated on his current mental state and dangerousness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“' "certain offenders convicted of nonserious and nonviolent property and drug crimes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Pipkin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.