7 Del. Ch.
Volume 7 — Delaware Chancery
19 opinions
- 7 Del. Ch. 1In re Estate of Journey (1892)
Petition of Sarah Ann Munday for construction of' certain portions of the will of Moses Journey, deceased.. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Chancellor.
- 7 Del. Ch. 16Van Vrankin v. Roberts (1893)
Petition to draw money out of court. Petition of the Security Trust and Safe Deposit Company of Wilmington, to draw certain moneys out of court, deposited in the registry thereof, pursuant to a decree of the court confirming the sale of certain lands upon which it held a second mortgage and which were sold under a previous decree, foreclosing a first mortgage thereon, held hy the Pennsylvania Company for Insurance of Lives and Granting Annuities, as assignee.
- 7 Del. Ch. 29Reybold v. Reybold (1893)
Bill in Equity.—■ Philip Eeybold, Sr., departed this life on or about the 28th day of February, A. D. 1854, having first published his last will and testament, which provided inter alia as follows: “ Third, I give and bequeath to my son, John Eeybold, in trust for his three blind children, George U. Reybold, Elizabeth Reybold and John Reybold, one hundred shares of the capital stock of the Delaware City Bank, standing- in my name upon the books of the said bank, and do…
- 7 Del. Ch. 42In re Harris (1893)
Petition for provisional order pending proceedings in lunacy. The facts are fully stated in the first portion of the opinion of the Chancellor.
- 7 Del. Ch. 56Mayor of Wilmington v. Addicks (1893)
Injunction Bill.— Bill filed by the mayor and council of the City of Wilmington, at the instance of the members of the board of directors of the street and sewer department, against John Edward Addicks, John G. Baker, Frederick P. Addicks, Simon B. Conde and Samuel Austin, to enjoin said defendants from opening the streets in the City of Wilmington and laying- gas pipes therein, without permission being first had and obtained from the said board of directors of the street…
- 7 Del. Ch. 83Allen v. Leach (1894)
Exceptions to the account of an administrator. Judicial settlement of the account of James Leach, administrator de lonis non, with the will annexed, of the estate of William Allen, deceased, to which William Allen and others filed exceptions. The facts.are fully set forth in the first portion of the opinion of the Chancellor.
- 7 Del. Ch. 111Spruance v. Darlington (1894)
Bill ikt Equity.— Bill by William C. Spruance, as administrator with the will annexed of King Dolbow, deceased, against Thomas Darlington, executor of Margaret Dolbow, deceased, and others. Defendant’s decedent had qualified as executrix under a supposed will of said King Dolbow, her deceased husband, and had administered his estate in accordance with its terms.
- 7 Del. Ch. 136Morris v. Board of Pilot Commissioners (1894)
Injunction Bill.— Action by Charles S. Morris and others against the Board of Pilot. Commissioners to enjoin the defendants from revoking the plaintiffs’ licenses. A full statement of facts will be found in .the opinion of the Chancellor.
- 7 Del. Ch. 162Frost v. McCaulley (1894)
Bill lit Equity.— Bill filed by Florence Hill Frost, legatee under the last will and testament of William McOaulley, deceased, for construction of certain portions of said will of said deceased.
- 7 Del. Ch. 178Bringhurst v. Orth (1894)
Bill of Interpleader and for instructions to executor and construction of will. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Chancellor.
- 7 Del. Ch. 208Parker v. Yerger (1894)
Bill for Specific Performance.-— Bill filed by ■James Parker against Hiram Yerger to compel the specific performance of certain articles of agreement entered into between them for the purchase and sale of land. James Parker, the complainant, being in possession of a lot of land in the City of Wilmington, on the 1st day of January, A. D. 1895, entered into certain articles of .agreement in writing with Hiram.
- 7 Del. Ch. 226Jessup & Moore Paper Co. v. Ford (1895)
Attachment por Contempt.— Rule to show cause why Peter J. Ford should not be punished for contempt in consequence of an alleged violation or breach of an injunction.
- 7 Del. Ch. 232Allen v. Leach (1895)
Bill in Equity.— Bill filed by certain of the legatees under the last will and testament of William Allen, deceased, to recover from James Leach, the administrator, de bonis non, with the will annexed, their respective legacies or distributive shares of the funds shown to be in his hands by a corrected account on file in the register’s office in and for Hew Castle County.
- 7 Del. Ch. 248In re Receivership Lord & Polk Chemical Co. (1895)
Petition for the ascertainment of the priority of certain liens.—- This case came up on the petition of certain creditors of the Lord & Polk Chemical Company praying for the ascertainment of the priority of certain liens against said Lord & Polk Chemical Company. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Chancellor.
- 7 Del. Ch. 266Lambden v. West (1895)
<p>Injunction Bill.— The facts are fully set forth in the first portion of the opinion of the Chancellor.</p>
- 7 Del. Ch. 287Allen v. Stewart (1895)
Injunction Bill.— Bill filed by Jehu L. Allen against Theodore Stewart, and Paul Gilles, sheriff of New Castle County, to restrain them from selling 200 shares of stock of the Journal Printing Company,' a corporation existing in this State, under fi. fa. attachment against Charles William Edwards.
- 7 Del. Ch. 303Williams v. Odessa & Middletown Railway Co. (1895)
Injunction Bill.-—■ It is admitted and agreed by and between the complainant and respondent respectively that the statement of facts hereinafter set forth is a true and correct statement thereof, and that for the purposes of argument and the decision of this cause, shall be held and taken to be conclusively proved and established:— First.
- 7 Del. Ch. 398Equitable Guarantee & Trust Co. v. Rogers (1895)
<p>Bill for Instructions.— The facts in this case are stated in the first part of the opinion of the Chancellor.</p>
- 7 Del. Ch. 432McGrenra v. McGrenra (1890)
<p>Application for Assignment of Dower.— Petition, of Mary McGrenra for assignment of dower in the estate of her deceased husband.</p>