Continental Ins. v. Titcomb’s Empirical Analysis
7 F.2d 833
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 1989
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Burchell v. Marsh · Ebner v. Ohio State Life Insurance · Dunton v. Westchester Fire Insurance · Kollitz v. Equitable Mutual Fire Insurance · Phœnix Ins. Co. v. Everfresh Food Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Item I: The net profits on the business which is thereby prevented; “Item II: Fixed charges and expenses only to the extent to which they would have been earned had no fire occurred, as follows: — * * * depreciation * * * and such other fixed charges and expenses which must necessarily continue during a total or partial suspension of business.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.