Smith’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently January 2015
2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Clark · Rowland v. Skaggs Companies, Inc. · Kaiser v. Memorial Blood Center of Minneapolis, Inc. · J.E.K. Industries, Inc. v. Shoemaker · Hershley v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“may turn on whether [Mrs. Smith's] lookback claim is one for `negligence ... related to health care,'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“which statute of limitations applies to [Mrs. Smith's] claim and when the claim accrued.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.