Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 7 F.3d 1279 - United States v. Gio

United States v. Gio’s Empirical Analysis

7 F.3d 1279 · 1993

Citation profile

95
cited by 95 later decisions
2
states following
February 2008
most recently cited

67 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 152 · 18 U.S.C. § 3664 · 18 U.S.C. § 371

Relies on Bruton v. United States · Richardson v. Marsh · Zafiro v. United States · Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona · Brewster v. Derwinski

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 95 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A question involving the interpretation of a Guidelines term, by contrast, is a matter of law subject to de novo review.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'contextual implication' argument, which asks that we look beyond the confession to other evidence presented at trial to determine if [the codefendant] was incriminated ...”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “product of a conclusion that the judge lacks authority to depart.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.