Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 7 F.3d 1455 - Harman v. Harper

Harman v. Harper’s Empirical Analysis

7 F.3d 1455 · 1993

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
3
states following
November 2019
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently November 2019 · most notably Garamendi v. Henin (2012), In Re the Marriage of Buck (2002)

8 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

130199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Browder v. Director Department of Corrections of Illinois · Castor v. United States · Federal Trade Commission v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co. · International Controls Corp. v. Vesco · Scola v. Boat Frances, R., Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The basic distinction between 'clerical mistakes' and mistakes that cannot be corrected pursuant to Rule 60(a) is that the former consist of 'blunders in execution' whereas the latter consist of instances where the court changes its mind....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “does not bring the entire underlying judgment up for review.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “are not to be applied so as to permit a tolling of their time limitations because some event occurred in the lower court after judgment was rendered which is of no import to the matters to be dealt with on review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.