United States v. Simpson’s Empirical Analysis
7 F.3d 186 · 1993
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 10 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently January 2023 · most notably United States v. Dazey (2005), United States v. Scarborough (1997)
10 federal appellate · 10 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Griffin v. California · Lockett v. Ohio · California State Board of Equalization v. Western Marina Corp. · California v. ARC America Corp. · Williams v. Florida
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the jury is provided with no independent means by which it can reach its own conclusion or give proper weight to the expert testimony”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“expert merely states an opinion on an ultimate issue without adequately exploring the criteria upon which the opinion is based,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.