Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

7 F.3d 222

Docket No. 93-6146.

Bernard v. Berry

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: July 6, 1993. Decided: September 14, 1993.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1993-09-14

Cited by 24 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1994

22 federal appellate ·

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1993-09-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-92-409)

Peter Emmanuel Bernard, Appellant Pro Se.

Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Peter Emmanuel Bernard appeals from the district court's orders that granted summary judgment to some defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) action and adopted the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge in dismissing his remaining claims. Our review of the record and the district court's opinions discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court and the magistrate judge. Bernard v. Berry, No. CA-92-409 (E.D. Va. Sept. 11, 1992; Jan. 28, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/7/f3d/222 · .json · Public domain