White v. Shalala’s Empirical Analysis
7 F.3d 296 · 1993
Citation profile
43 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 86 later decisions — most recently April 2020 · most notably Lisa L. Fitzgerald v. William Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (2001), Nancy Sweet v. Robert Sheahan (2000)
43 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 38 U.S.C. § 1114 · 38 U.S.C. § 1521 · 42 U.S.C. § 1382 (§ 1611 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1382A (§ 1612 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1382C (§ 1614 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 5 U.S.C. § 553 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946)
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona · Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council · Perrin v. United States · Rust v. Sullivan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“clarify an existing statute or regulation.”
14 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“If the rule is an interpretation of a statute rather than an extra-statutory imposition of rights, duties or obligations, it remains interpretive even if the rule embodies the Secretary's changed interpretation of the statute.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[w]e review de novo whether the district court correctly interpreted the statute.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.