Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 7 F.3d 35 - 23885e Nysa-Ila Pension Trust Fund Bowers

23885e Nysa-Ila Pension Trust Fund Bowers’s Empirical Analysis

7 F.3d 35 · 1993

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
August 2013
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2013 · most notably Filetech Sa Usa v. France Telecom Sa (1998), World Wide Minerals, Ltd. v. Republic of Kazakhstan (2002)

10 federal appellate · 3 district ·

180199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping Corp. · First National City Bank v. Banco Para El Comercio Exterior De Cuba · Saudi Arabia v. Nelson · Wrenn v. Gould · Stena Rederi AB v. Comision de Contratos del Comite Ejecutivo General del Sindicato Revolucionario de Trabajadores Petroleros de la Republica Mexicana, S.C.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a significant nexus . . . between the commercial activity in this country upon which the exception is based and a plaintiff's cause of action.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[ 1] in which the action is based upon a commercial activity earned on in the United States by the foreign state; or [2] upon an act performed in the United States in connection with a commercial activity of the foreign state elsewhere; or [3] upon an act outside the territory of the United States in connection with a commercial activity of the foreign state elsewhere and that act causes a direct effect in the United States.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[b]efore a federal court may apply corporate law, or the controlled group provisions of ERISA or any other rule of law in a case involving a foreign state or instrumentality of that state, it must, as a threshold matter, find an exception to the [Act]'s grant of sovereign immunity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Gates

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.