Stewart v. Bailey’s Empirical Analysis
7 F.3d 384 · 1993
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably Smith v. Ashcroft (2002), Jones v. Angelone (1996)
10 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Wolff v. McDonnell · Hewitt v. Helms · Meachum v. Fano
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[r]equest filed by a criminal justice agency with [the] institution in which [a] prisoner is incarcerated, asking [the] institution either to hold [the] prisoner for [the] agency or to notify [the] agency when release of [the] prisoner is imminent, (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary 449 (6th ed.1990) which quotes Carchman v. Nash, 473 U.S. 716, 719 , 105 S.Ct. 3401, 3403 , 87 L.Ed.2d 516 (1985)).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The procedures may be changed at the will of prison officials so long as they afford that process which is due under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hill v. Jackson“specific directives to the decisionmaker that if the regulations' substantive predicates are present, a particular outcome must follow.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.