Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 7 F.3d 648 - United States v. Brown

United States v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

7 F.3d 648 · 1993

Citation profile

69
cited by 69 later decisions
1
states following
August 2023
most recently cited

48 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably United States v. Frazier (2004), United States v. Gibbs (1999)

48 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

4001993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos. · American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States · National Union Fire Insurance v. Helfand · Brewster v. Derwinski

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]f [the expert] had responded that the circumstances suggested that this cocaine probably would be distributed, there would be no Rule 704(b) issue. It is only the expert's use of the world 'intended' that implicates the rule.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Special deference also is due the district court's assessment of the probative value of evidence because that court is in the best position to balance probative value against the danger of unfair prejudice.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[n]o expert witness testifying with respect to the mental state or condition of a defendant in a criminal case may state an opinion or inference as to whether the defendant did or did not have the mental state or condition constituting an element of the crime charged or a defense thereto.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.