United States v. Marin’s Empirical Analysis
7 F.3d 679 · 1993
Citation profile
54 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 72 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2016 · most notably United States v. Williamson (1995), United States v. Canoy (1994)
54 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Hernandez v. New York · United States v. Procter & Gamble Co. · Stafford v. Oklahoma · Baskett v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]bsent legal error, exclusions of time cannot be reversed except when there is an abuse of discretion by the court and a showing of actual prejudice.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“First, the defendant must make a prima facia showing that the prosecutor has exercised a peremptory challenge on the basis of race. Second, if the requisite [prima facia showing of racially based peremptory challenge] has been made, the burden shifts to the prosecutor to articulate a race-neutral reason for striking the jurors in question. Finally, the trial court must determine whether the defendant has carried his burden of proving purposeful discrimination.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[u]nless a discriminatory intent is inherent in the prosecutor's explanation, the reason offered will be deemed race [or gender] neutral.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.