Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 7 F.3d 813 - United States v. Simpson

United States v. Simpson’s Empirical Analysis

7 F.3d 813 · 1993

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
November 2017
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently November 2017 · most notably United States v. Canoy (1994), United States v. Bieri (1994)

33 federal appellate · 3 district ·

320199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3582 · 18 U.S.C. § 3661 (Drug and Alcohol Dependent Offenders Treatment Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 991 · 28 U.S.C. § 994 · 7 U.S.C. § 2024

Relies on Solem v. Helm · Williams v. United States · Brewster v. Derwinski · Nicholas v. United States · Joseph v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The lower limit of the range for Criminal History Category I is set for a first offender with the lowest risk of recidivism. Therefore, a departure below the lower limit of the guideline range for Criminal History Category I on the basis of the adequacy of criminal history cannot be appropriate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he departure must be based on factual findings supported by the record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “qualif[y] as aberrant behavior warranting a departure”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.