Carvalho v. Doe’s Empirical Analysis
1947
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
August 1997
most recently cited
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 · 29 U.S.C. § 256 · 29 U.S.C. § 257
Relies on 50 F. Supp. 789 - United States v. Spreckels · Fleming v. Weisberg
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, the defendant recognizes provides that an action is commenced when the complaint is filed. But relying upon the cases which point out that this is so only if there is no culpable unreasonable delay in making service of process, the defendant argues that here there has been over a two-year delay in effecting service and that that is an unreasonable time for which the plaintiff is responsible and which due diligence would have prevented. See United States v. Spreckels, D.C.N.D.Cal., S. D.1943, 50 F.Supp. 789 . “Without more that would certainly appear to be so.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.