7 F. Supp. 2d 247 - Brady v. Marks’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 241 (Church Arson Prevention Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Heck v. Humphrey · District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman · Imbler v. Pachtman · Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. · Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“least restrictive, but effective, means of protecting the courts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Zorn v. Smith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.