¶1dissenting. This plaintiff in error had more liquor on hand than an ordinary day-laborer (and such the evidence shows him to be) would be expected to have for legitimate purposes. His explanation was not at all satisfactory. Any man,, rich or poor, who has whisky and whisky bottles hidden around in. his house from cellar to attic has no legal cause of complaint i£ the tribunal trying the case happens to hold more than a bare suspicion that he has been using it illegitimately.
7 Ga. App. 417
Walker v. City Council
Decided February 10, 1910
Court of Appeals of Georgia · decided 1910-02-10
<p>The finding of the city council was without any evidence to support it, and the judge of the superior court erred in not sustaining the certiorari.</p>
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 1914
3 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1910-02-10
View the full empirical analysis of this case →