¶1Where a deed to land described the quantity of acres conveyed as being “80 acres, more or less, ” and there was an alleged' shortage of 26 acres, it was for the jury, and not for the court, to say whether this deficiency was so gross as to authorize a rescission of *713the contract, or an apportionment of the purchase-price, under §3542 of the Civil Code. - Judgment reversed.
7 Ga. App. 712
Bryan v. Yates
Decided May 12, 1910
Court of Appeals of Georgia · decided 1910-05-12
<p>Complaint; from city court of Moultrie — Judge McKenzie. Hovember 13, 1909.</p>
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1910-05-12
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently November 1952
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →