¶1The failure to comply with the provisions of §5488 of the Civil Code, as to the preparation of the brief of the evidence, is so flagrant and palpable as to forbid this court’s examining the facts. See Lanham v. Presley, ante, 839 (68 S. E.), and cases there cited. However, we may say, in passing, that the' defendant was lawfully convicted of the very heinous crime with which he was charged. Judgment affirmed.
7 Ga. App. 841
Crumpton v. State
Decided June 14, 1910
Court of Appeals of Georgia · decided 1910-06-14
<p>There being no legal brief of the evidence, and the errors assigned being dependent upon the evidence, the judgment is affirmed.</p>
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 1937
2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1910-06-14
View the full empirical analysis of this case →