7 Haw. App. 183 - Beclar Corp. v. Young’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
6 district · 24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably Koolau Radiology, Inc. v. Queen's Medical Center (1992), Weinberg v. Mauch (1995)
6 district · 24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ai v. Frank Huff Agency, Ltd. · Shoemaker v. Takai · 5 Haw. App. 581 - Burgess v. Arita · Leeward Bus Co., Ltd. v. CITY & CTY. OF HONOLULU · Hung Wo Ching v. Hawaiian Restaurants, Ltd.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) a contract between the plaintiff and a third party, (2) the defendant’s knowledge of the contract, (3) the defendant’s intentional inducement of the third party to breach the contract, (4) absence of justification on the defendant’s part, (5) the subsequent breach of the contract by the third party, and (6) damages to the plaintiff.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“one party to an arbitration agreement could not abandon the arbitration process once it had begun observing its terms, stating that, “[t]he effectiveness of arbitration as a vehicle for the resolution of disputes depends in part upon the predictability of its efficiency. * * * [Pjredictability is not assured if the caprice of the parties controls the * * * process.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.