7 Haw. App. 238 - Cobb v. Willis’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Yarborough v. Yarborough · Ahuna v. Department of Hawaiian Home Lands · 2 Haw. App. 77 - Dowsett v. Cashman · 5 Haw. App. 435 - Joaquin v. Joaquin · Inter-Island Resorts, Ltd. v. Akahane
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. the court rendering it had jurisdiction to act judicially in the case; 2. the party against whom the judgment is sought to be invoked had reasonable notice of the litigation and was afforded a reasonable opportunity to be heard; 3. it was rendered by a competent court; and 4. it is in compliance with the rendering state’s requirements for the valid exercise of its court’s powers.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Tougas v. Tougas · Guray v. Tacras
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.