Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 7 Haw. App. 80 - State v. Rodrigues

7 Haw. App. 80 - State v. Rodrigues’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
May 2022
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 2022

20 state decisions

16019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Ohio v. Roberts · Pointer v. Texas · California v. Green · Bourjaily v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To demonstrate the unavailability of a de-clarant at trial, the prosecution must show that it made a good faith attempt to secure his or her presence. To establish this good faith attempt, the prosecution must confirm on the record at the time of trial both the declarant’s unavailability and that vigorous and appropriate steps were taken to procure the declarant’s presence at trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[t]he right of confrontation `affords the accused both the opportunity to challenge the credibility and veracity of the prosecution's witnesses and an occasion for the jury to weigh the demeanor of those witnesses.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “when the prosecution seeks to admit testimony from a prior judicial proceeding in place of live testimony at trial”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.