¶2As the judge received the papers and had the matter under advisement when the first judge was absent from the county, he acquired jurisdiction of the matter, and might well complete the business after the first judge had returned.
¶3Motion denied.
7 Hill & Den. 170
Anonymous
Decided December 15, 1844
New York Supreme Court · decided 1844-12-15
moved to quash the writ of error issued in this case to the Cayuga C. P., on the ground that the cause was brought into the C. P. by certiorari from a justice’s court, and the certificate that the cause was a proper one to be carried to this court was made by one of the puisne judges when the first judge was in the county.
Decided 1844-12-15