7 Ill. App. 400
Decided December 4, 1880
Appellate Court of Illinois · decided 1880-12-04
<p>Practice — Billon exceptions. — There being no hill of exceptions properly signed in the record, and no suggestion of a diminution of the record, the presumption is that the original bill of exceptions was not signed, and the judgment will be affirmed.</p>
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1888
1 state decisions
Relies on Miller v. Jenkins · Reeves v. Reeves
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1880-12-04
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1In this record there is no bill of exceptions signed and sealed by the judge who tried the cause, and no suggestion of a diminution of the record having been made, the presumption is that the original bill of exceptions was not signed. Miller v. Jenkins, 44 Ill. 443.
¶2In such case we cannot consider what is copied into the the record as a bill of exceptions to be any part of the record. Reeves v. Reeves, 54 Ill. 332.
¶3. The judgment will be affirmed.
¶4Judgment affirmed.