Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 7 ILLAPP 55 - Thrift v. Frittz

Thrift v. Frittz’s Empirical Analysis

1880

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 1980
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently September 1980

3 state decisions

1018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Guyman v. Burlingame · Richards v. Porter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The purchaser at a judicial sale is always entitled to such interest as the defendant actually has. If a sale from any defect in the proceedings is so void as that it can not transfer such title and interest as the defendant has, then the purchaser is not bound by his bid, but may successfully resist any action seeking its enforcement." ( 7 Ill. App. 55, 58 .)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.